Facility Name:DAIKIN AMERICA INC.
Facility Identifier:
Facility Reporting Year:2022
Facility Location:
Address: 905 STATE DOCKS ROAD
City: DECATUR
State: AL
Postal Code: 35601

Facility Site Details:
CO2 equivalent emissions from facility subparts C-II, SS, and TT (metric tons):771,753.1
CO2 equivalent emissions from supplier subparts LL-QQ (metric tons):
Biogenic CO2 emissions from facility subparts C-II, SS, and TT (metric tons):0
Cogeneration Unit Emissions Indicator:N
GHG Report Start Date:2022-01-01
GHG Report End Date:2022-12-31
Description of Changes to Calculation Methodology:
Plant Code Indicator:N
Primary NAICS Code:325211
Second Primary NAICS Code:325120

Parent Company Details:
Parent Company Name:DAIKIN HOLDINGS AMERICA INC
Address:9920 Corporate Campus Drive, Suite 2200, Louisville,  KY 40223
Percent Ownership Interest:100

Subpart C: General Stationary Fuel Combustion

Gas Information Details

Gas NameCarbon Dioxide
Gas Quantity45,504 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameBiogenic Carbon dioxide
Gas Quantity0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameMethane
Gas Quantity0.86 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameNitrous Oxide
Gas Quantity0.086 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Unit Details:
Unit Name : GP-DAIKIN FG Units
Unit Type : OCS (Other combustion source)
Unit Description :
Other Unit Name :
Small Unit Aggregation Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: Y
Highest Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 73.8
Cumulative Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 167.9

Emission Details:
Annual CO2 mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)
Annual Fossil fuel based CO2 Emissions: 45504 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:
Fuel : Natural Gas (Weighted U.S. Average)
Tier Name : Tier 2 (Equation C-2a)
Tier Methodology Start Date : 2022-01-01
Tier Methodology End Date : 2022-12-31
Frequency of HHV determinations : Other (specify)
Other specified frequency of HHV determinations : Annually

Tier 2 Monthly HHV Details :
JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
N N N N N N N N N N N N

Fuel Emission Details :
Total CO2 emissionsTotal CH4 emissionsTotal N2O emissionsTotal CH4 emissions CO2eTotal N2O emissions CO2e
45504.0 (Metric Tons) 0.86 (Metric Tons) 0.086 (Metric Tons) 21.4 (Metric Tons) 25.6 (Metric Tons)



Subpart L: Fluorinated Gas Production

Gas Information Details

Gas NameOther
Other Gas NameCO2 equivalent (from unspecified gases)
Gas Quantity722,302.6 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?


Summary Information
Did the facility produce only one fluorinated gas product, including fluorinated gas products that are intermediates?No
Did the facility emit 1,000 or more metric tons of CO2e of any one fluorinated GHG from production and transformation processes, summed across the facility as a whole?Yes
Did the facility destroy previously produced fluorinated GHGs in destruction processes that are not part of a fluorinated gas production process or fluorinated gas transformation process?No
Did the facility vent residual fluorinated GHGs from containers?Yes


Production and Transformation Process F-GHG Emissions
Gas NameGas DescriptionCAS No.GWP GroupProduction and transformation process F-GHG emissions (metric tons)Optional Comments
PerfluorocyclobutaneC-C4F8115-25-366.8853
HFE-449sl, (HFE-7100) Isomer blendC4F9OCH3, (CF3)2CFCF2OCH3163702-07-6, 163702-08-77.7301
PFC-116 (Perfluoroethane)C2F676-16-42.0776


Venting of Residual F-GHGs
Gas NameGas DescriptionCAS No.GWP GroupFluorinated F-GHGs vented from containers returned from the field (metric tons):Optional Comments
HFC-134aCH2FCF3811-97-20.89
HFC-32CH2F275-10-50.89
HFC-125C2HF5354-33-60.89


Container Information
Container nameDescription (optional)Was based on a missing data procedure?Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing dataNumber of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from containerProvide the method used to estimate the missing dataIf the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of the missing data
ISO_ContainerNo


Production and Transformation Process GHG Group Emissions
Fluorinated GHG GroupProduction and transformation process GHG group emissions (metric tons CO2e)Optional Comments
Unsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones19.2514
Saturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds255.3235
Saturated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with 2 or fewer carbon-hydrogen bonds478.4442


Production and Transformation Processes

Unique Name/IdentifierTFE Manufacturing
Process TypeProduction Process
Characterize the process:
ReactionYes
DistillationYes
Packaging
Optional Comments
The range (Table L-2) that encompasses the effective destruction efficiency, DEeffective, calculated for this process using Equation L-35.>=99%


Process Vent Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)18.9
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)0.0
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)0.8
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with 2 or fewer carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)2.3
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Were the annual emissions of one or more F-GHG groups based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from process vents
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of missing data


Equipment Leak Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)34455.1


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)0.3


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)0.0


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with 2 or fewer carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)0.0


Were the annual emissions from equipment leaks based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from equipment leaks
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of the missing data


Unique Name/IdentifierHFP Manufacturing
Process TypeTransformation Process
Characterize the process:
ReactionYes
DistillationYes
Packaging
Optional Comments
The range (Table L-2) that encompasses the effective destruction efficiency, DEeffective, calculated for this process using Equation L-35.>=99%


Process Vent Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)11.6
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation FactorYes
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)0.0
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)2.3
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with 2 or fewer carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)7.2
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Were the annual emissions of one or more F-GHG groups based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from process vents
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of missing data


Equipment Leak Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)10893.5


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)1.0


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)79.2


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with 2 or fewer carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)468.9


Were the annual emissions from equipment leaks based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from equipment leaks
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of the missing data


Unique Name/IdentifierPTFE Manufacturing
Process TypeTransformation Process
Characterize the process:
ReactionYes
Distillation
Packaging
Optional Comments
The range (Table L-2) that encompasses the effective destruction efficiency, DEeffective, calculated for this process using Equation L-35.>=0% to <75%


Process Vent Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation FactorYes
Process Vent Specific Emission Factor
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)0.1
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Were the annual emissions of one or more F-GHG groups based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from process vents
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of missing data


Equipment Leak Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)0.0


Were the annual emissions from equipment leaks based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from equipment leaks
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of the missing data


Unique Name/IdentifierMelt Resin Production
Process TypeTransformation
Characterize the process:
ReactionYes
Distillation
Packaging
Optional Comments
The range (Table L-2) that encompasses the effective destruction efficiency, DEeffective, calculated for this process using Equation L-35.>=0% to <75%


Process Vent Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation Factor
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)406744.9
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation FactorYes
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)6.7
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from process vents
Process Vent Emission Calculation FactorYes
Process Vent Specific Emission FactorYes
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from all process vents combined (metric tons CO2e)1084.4
Effective destruction efficiency range (CO2e basis)


Were the annual emissions of one or more F-GHG groups based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from process vents
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of missing data


Equipment Leak Emissions

Fluorinated GHG GroupFully fluorinated GHGs
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)262140.7


Fluorinated GHG GroupUnsaturated perfluorocarbons (PFCs), unsaturated HFCs, unsaturated hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated halogenated ethers, unsaturated halogenated esters, fluorinated aldehydes, and fluorinated ketones
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)11.2


Fluorinated GHG GroupSaturated HFEs and HCFEs with 3 or more carbon-hydrogen bonds
Methods used to determine the mass emissions of each fluorinated GHG group emitted from equipment leaks
Average EF Approach
Screening Ranges Approach w/ M21Yes
EPA Correlation Approach w/ M21Yes
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ M21
Screening Ranges Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
EPA Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Unit Specific Correlation Approach w/ Site Specific Leak Monitoring Method
Other Site Specific Leak Monitoring
GWP-weighted mass of all fluorinated GHGs in this group emitted from equipment leaks (metric tons CO2e)1384.4


Were the annual emissions from equipment leaks based on a missing data procedure?No
Data element for which missing data procedures were used, and the reason for the missing data
Number of hours a missing data procedure was used to determine F-GHG emissions from equipment leaks
Provide the method used to estimate the missing data
If the data element is reportable under subpart L, provide estimates of the missing data


Subpart O: HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 Destruction

Gas Information Details

Gas NameCarbon Dioxide
Gas Quantity0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameBiogenic Carbon dioxide
Gas Quantity0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameMethane
Gas Quantity0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameNitrous Oxide
Gas Quantity0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas NameHFC-23
Gas CAS Registry Number75-46-7
Gas Linear Chemical FormulaCHF3
Gas Quantity0.263468 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Subpart O Facility Information:

Indicate whether your facility produces HCFC-22Y
Indicate whether your facility sends any HFC-23 offsite for destructionN
Indicate whether your facility destroys HFC-23 onsiteY

HCFC-22 Production Process Information:

Production Process Name or IDR22 Production Process
For HCFC-22 producers, how do you estimate your HFC-23 emissions(Both indicates Equation O-4 and Equation O-5 are used)Equation O-5
Annual mass of HCFC-22 produced ()
Reactants Fed into the Process
Reactant NameAnnual mass of reactant fed into the processIndicate whether the annual mass of the reactant fed into the process is based on a missing data procedureParameter for which missing data were usedOther parameterNumber of hours that a missing data procedure was used to determine the annual mass of the reactant fed into the process
() N
() N
The combined mass of all materials other than HCFC-22 and HFC-23 (i.e., unreacted reactants, HCI and other by-products) that occur in more than trace concentrations and that are permanently removed from the process ()
Indicate whether the annual mass of combined mass of all materials other than HCFC-22 and HFC-23 at the facility is based on a missing data procedureN
Number of hours that a missing data procedure was used to determine the annual mass of combined mass of all materials other than HCFC-22 and HFC-23
Method for tracking startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions and HFC-23 generation/emissions during these eventsT-Thermal CISWI unit has full DCS and PLC controls and interlocks in place to prevent emissions.
Annual HFC-23 Emissions from the Facility Calculated Using Equation O-4 ()
Annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from all equipment leaks at the facility0.003627 (Metric Tons)
Was the annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from all equipment leaks at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from all process vents at the facility0.259841 (Metric Tons)
Was the annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from all process vents at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Annual HFC-23 Emissions from the Facility Calculated Using Equation O-50.263468 (Metric Tons)

Destruction Processes Connected to the HCFC-22 Production Equipment
Unique Name/Identifier of destruction process connected to the HCFC-22 production equipmentDaikin T-Thermal Incinerator
Description of Destruction ProcessCISWI Daikin T-Thermal Incinerator
Was the HFC-23 fed into the on-site destruction process originally generated by an on-site HCFC-22 production process?Y
Is the annual mass of HFC-23 fed into the destruction device at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Is the annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from the destruction device at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Concentration of HFC-23 measured at the outlet of the destruction device during the facility's annual HFC-23 concentration measurements at the outlet of the device0 (mass fraction)
Is the concentration below the detection limit?N
Detection limit concentration ()
Detection limit concentration units
Was the HFC-23 concentration measured pursuant to §98.154(l) greater than that measured during the performance test that was the basis for the destruction efficiency? N
Indicate the method used to calculate the revised destruction efficiency, specifying whether §98.154(l)(1) or (2) was used
Have you made changes that affect the HFC-23 destruction efficiency or the methods used to record the quantity destroyed?N
Methods used to determine destruction efficiency
Methods used to record the mass of HFC-23 destroyed
Name of other relevant federal or state regulations that may apply to the destruction process
Annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from the destruction process (device)0.545636 (Metric Tons)



Off-Site Destruction Facility:


On-Site Destruction Process (only destruction devices that are not directly connected to HFC-22 production equipment)

Unique Name/IdentifierT-Thermal Incinerator
Description of Destruction Process
Was the HFC-23 fed into the on-site destruction process originally generated by an on-site HCFC-22 production process?
Is the annual mass of HFC-23 fed into the destruction device at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Is the annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from the destruction device at the facility based on a missing data procedure?N
Concentration of HFC-23 measured at the outlet of the destruction device during the facility's annual HFC-23 concentration measurements at the outlet of the device0 (mass fraction)
Is the concentration below the detection limit?N
Detection limit concentration ()
Detection limit concentration units
Was the HFC-23 concentration measured pursuant to §98.154(l) greater than that measured during the performance test that was the basis for the destruction efficiency? N
Indicate the method used to calculate the revised destruction efficiency, specifying whether §98.154(l)(1) or (2) was used
Have you made changes that affect the HFC-23 destruction efficiency or the methods used to record the quantity destroyed?N
Methods used to determine destruction efficiency
Methods used to record the mass of HFC-23 destroyed
Name of other relevant federal or state regulations that may apply to the destruction process
Annual mass of HFC-23 emitted from the destruction process (device)0.545636 (Metric Tons)