GHG Summary Report

CO2 equivalent emissions from facility subparts C-II, SS, and TT (metric tons):808,888.6
CO2 equivalent emissions from supplier subparts LL-QQ (metric tons):
Biogenic CO2 emissions from facility subparts C-II, SS, and TT (metric tons):0
Cogeneration Unit Emissions Indicator:Y
GHG Report Start Date:2020-01-01
GHG Report End Date:2020-12-31
Description of Changes to Calculation Methodology:
Did you use an EPA-approved BAMM in this reporting year for Subpart C?
Did you use an EPA-approved BAMM in this reporting year for Subpart X?
Plant Code Indicator:N
Primary NAICS Code:325199
Second Primary NAICS Code:
Additional NAICS Codes: 325211
Parent Company Details:

Parent Company Name:DOW INC
Address:2030 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674
Percent Ownership Interest:100

Subpart C: General Stationary Fuel Combustion

Gas Information Details

Gas Name	Carbon Dioxide
Gas Quantity	546,701.9 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Biogenic Carbon dioxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Methane
Gas Quantity	10.31 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Nitrous Oxide
Gas Quantity	1.031 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Unit Details:

Unit Name : ES_BLR_#11 DUCT BURNER
Unit Type : PRH (Process Heater)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 309 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

Fuel : Natural Gas (Weighted U.S. Average)
Tier Name : Tier 2 (Equation C-2a)
Tier Methodology Start Date : 2020-01-01
Tier Methodology End Date : 2020-12-31
Frequency of HHV determinations : Quarterly

Tier 2 Monthly HHV Details :

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
9457.9 (Metric Tons)	0.18 (Metric Tons)	0.018 (Metric Tons)	4.5 (Metric Tons)	5.3 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 172060000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : ES_BLR_#6 DUCT BURNER
Unit Type : PRH (Process Heater)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 220 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
23484.2 (Metric Tons)	0.44 (Metric Tons)	0.044 (Metric Tons)	11.1 (Metric Tons)	13.2 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 427227000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : ES_BLR_#8 DUCT BURNER
Unit Type : PRH (Process Heater)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 220 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
22578.1 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	0.043 (Metric Tons)	10.6 (Metric Tons)	12.7 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 410744000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : HP2_INC_SCREEN PACK CLEANER
Unit Type : O (Oven)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 0.5 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
20.7 (Metric Tons)	0.00 (Metric Tons)	0.000 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 377352 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.001036 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : OX_GTB_IGT WHB
Unit Type : SCCT (CT (Turbine, simple cycle combustion))
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 280 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
72907.2 (Metric Tons)	1.37 (Metric Tons)	0.137 (Metric Tons)	34.4 (Metric Tons)	40.9 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 1326337742.35478 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : OX_PRH_TETRLN HTR
Unit Type : PRH (Process Heater)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 50 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
395.0 (Metric Tons)	0.01 (Metric Tons)	0.001 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 7185947.18 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.001036 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : OX_FLR_2 INCH FLARE
Unit Type : FLR (Flare)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 1.16 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
49.8 (Metric Tons)	0.00 (Metric Tons)	0.000 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 905381.021872 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.001036 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : DWF_BLR_BARGE DOCK BOILER
Unit Type : OB (Boiler, other)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 8 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
4012.9 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	0.008 (Metric Tons)	1.9 (Metric Tons)	2.3 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 73003824 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : ES_BLR_#6 HEAT RECVY STEAM GENERATOR
Unit Type : SCCT (CT (Turbine, simple cycle combustion))
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 497 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
133127.9 (Metric Tons)	2.51 (Metric Tons)	0.251 (Metric Tons)	62.7 (Metric Tons)	74.8 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 2421882000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : ES_BLR_#8 HEAT RECVY STEAM GENERATOR
Unit Type : SCCT (CT (Turbine, simple cycle combustion))
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 497 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
174334.7 (Metric Tons)	3.29 (Metric Tons)	0.329 (Metric Tons)	82.1 (Metric Tons)	97.9 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 3171522000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : ES_BLR_COGEN 11 BOILER
Unit Type : SCCT (CT (Turbine, simple cycle combustion))
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 525 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
105625.5 (Metric Tons)	1.99 (Metric Tons)	0.199 (Metric Tons)	49.8 (Metric Tons)	59.3 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 1921553890.55 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : LP1F_INC_SCREEN PACK BURNER
Unit Type : O (Oven)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 6 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
35.7 (Metric Tons)	0.00 (Metric Tons)	0.000 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 650000 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.001036 (mmBtu/scf)

Unit Name : OX_FLR_24 INCH FLARE
Unit Type : FLR (Flare)
Unit Description :

Individual Unit Details:
Use Ivt Indicator: N
Maximum Rated Heat Input Capacity: 82.4 (mmBtu/hr)

Emission Details:
Annual CO₂ mass emissions from sorbent: 0 (Metric Tons)
Annual Biogenic CO2 Emissions: 0 (metric tons)

Tier Fuel Details:

January	February	March	April	May	June	July	August	September	October	November	December
N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N

Fuel Emission Details :

Total CO2 emissions	Total CH4 emissions	Total N2O emissions	Total CH4 emissions CO2e	Total N2O emissions CO2e
672.3 (Metric Tons)	0.01 (Metric Tons)	0.001 (Metric Tons)	0.3 (Metric Tons)	0.4 (Metric Tons)

Equation C2a/C9a Inputs :
Fuel Quantity : 12230834.3040006 (scf/year)
Use Default High Heat Value : true
High Heat Value : 0.00103597426666667 (mmBtu/scf)

Subpart X: Petrochemical Production

CEMS Monitoring Location (CML) Details for Subpart X

Gas Information Details

Gas Name	Carbon Dioxide
Gas Quantity	260,065.7 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Biogenic Carbon dioxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Methane
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Nitrous Oxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Petrochemical Process Units

Petrochemical process units monitored using the mass balance methodology:

Name or ID:OX_GRP_MASS BALANCE_SPX
Description:
Type:Petrochemical process unit
Identify combustion units:OX_FLR_24 INCH FLARE OX_FLR_2 INCH FLARE
AnnualCO2Emissions:260065.7 Metric Tons
Type of petrochemical produced:
Annual quantity of the petrochemical produced:
Annual average carbon content of the wastewater:
Annual average flow of wastewater:
Unit of measure for average flow of wastewater:
Annual mass of carbon released in fugitive emissions not controlled with a combustion device:
Annual mass of carbon released in process vents not controlled with a combustion device:

Feedstocks/Products:

Type:
State of Feedstock or product:
Identify each method (i.e., method number, title or other description) used to determine the flow or mass of each carbon-containing product or feedstock: Ethylene Supply Flow Meter
Annual quantity of feedstock or product:
If applicable, dates for each process change that reduced the composition to less than 99.5%:

Month

Volume for month based on missing data procedure

Volume measurement method

Other volume measurement method

Carbon content or composition for month based on missing data procedure

Carbon content or composition determination method

Specify the practice

Other Method

Name or title of the alternative carbon content determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative carbon content determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative carbon content determination method

Molecular weight for month based on missing data procedure, if applicable

Molecular weight determination method, if applicable

Other method

Name or title of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative molecular weight determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Temperature at which volume was measured

January

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

February

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

March

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

April

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

May

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

June

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

July

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

August

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

September

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

October

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

November

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

December

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon Content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Calculated based on chemical formula and atomic weights

68 degrees Fahrenheit

Type:
State of Feedstock or product:
Identify each method (i.e., method number, title or other description) used to determine the flow or mass of each carbon-containing product or feedstock: Tank Level Meter
Annual quantity of feedstock or product:
If applicable, dates for each process change that reduced the composition to less than 99.5%:

Month

Volume for month based on missing data procedure

Volume measurement method

Other volume measurement method

Carbon content or composition for month based on missing data procedure

Carbon content or composition determination method

Specify the practice

Other Method

Name or title of the alternative carbon content determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative carbon content determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative carbon content determination method

Molecular weight for month based on missing data procedure, if applicable

Molecular weight determination method, if applicable

Other method

Name or title of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative molecular weight determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Temperature at which volume was measured

January

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

February

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

March

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

April

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

May

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

June

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

July

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

August

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

September

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

October

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

November

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

December

Tank level measurements

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Type:
State of Feedstock or product:
Identify each method (i.e., method number, title or other description) used to determine the flow or mass of each carbon-containing product or feedstock: Ethylene Oxide rerun flow meter
Annual quantity of feedstock or product:
If applicable, dates for each process change that reduced the composition to less than 99.5%:

Month

Volume for month based on missing data procedure

Volume measurement method

Other volume measurement method

Carbon content or composition for month based on missing data procedure

Carbon content or composition determination method

Specify the practice

Other Method

Name or title of the alternative carbon content determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative carbon content determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative carbon content determination method

Molecular weight for month based on missing data procedure, if applicable

Molecular weight determination method, if applicable

Other method

Name or title of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative molecular weight determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Temperature at which volume was measured

January

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

February

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

March

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

April

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

May

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

June

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

July

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

August

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

September

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

October

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

November

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

December

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Carbon content calculated assuming 100% of the feedstock or product is the specific compound during periods of normal operation

Type:
State of Feedstock or product:
Identify each method (i.e., method number, title or other description) used to determine the flow or mass of each carbon-containing product or feedstock: EO to Glycol Meter
Annual quantity of feedstock or product:
If applicable, dates for each process change that reduced the composition to less than 99.5%:

Month

Volume for month based on missing data procedure

Volume measurement method

Other volume measurement method

Carbon content or composition for month based on missing data procedure

Carbon content or composition determination method

Specify the practice

Other Method

Name or title of the alternative carbon content determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative carbon content determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative carbon content determination method

Molecular weight for month based on missing data procedure, if applicable

Molecular weight determination method, if applicable

Other method

Name or title of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative molecular weight determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Temperature at which volume was measured

January

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

February

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

March

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

April

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

May

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

June

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

July

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

August

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

September

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

October

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

November

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

December

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

Type:
State of Feedstock or product:
Identify each method (i.e., method number, title or other description) used to determine the flow or mass of each carbon-containing product or feedstock: Ethylene Oxide Rerun Flow Meter
Annual quantity of feedstock or product:
If applicable, dates for each process change that reduced the composition to less than 99.5%:

Month

Volume for month based on missing data procedure

Volume measurement method

Other volume measurement method

Carbon content or composition for month based on missing data procedure

Carbon content or composition determination method

Specify the practice

Other Method

Name or title of the alternative carbon content determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative carbon content determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative carbon content determination method

Molecular weight for month based on missing data procedure, if applicable

Molecular weight determination method, if applicable

Other method

Name or title of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Explanation as to why an alternative molecular weight determination method was needed

File name of the copy of the alternative molecular weight determination method

Temperature at which volume was measured

January

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

February

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

March

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

April

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

May

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

June

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

July

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

August

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

September

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

October

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

November

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

December

Flow meter

Other (specify)

Assume 100% composition

Subpart TT: Industrial Waste Landfills

Gas Information Details

Gas Name	Carbon Dioxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Biogenic Carbon dioxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Methane
Gas Quantity	62.24 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Gas Name	Nitrous Oxide
Gas Quantity	0 (Metric Tons)
Own Result?

Landfill Details:

Was the landfill open or closed

Open

First year the landfill accepted waste

1983

If the landfill is open, the estimated year of landfill closure

2025

Landfill Capacity

300000 (Metric Tons)

Does the landfill have a landfill gas collection system

Passive vents and/or flares are present (vents or flares that are not considered part of the gas collection system)

An indication of whether leachate recirculation was used during the reporting year

The typical frequency of use of leachate recirculation over the past ten (10) years

Not used for the past ten (10) years

Each type of cover material used and Landfill surface area containing waste

Clay cover

6500 (Square Meters)

Number of waste streams

Annual modeled methane generation TT1

69.15 (Metric Tons)

Annual modeled methane generation TT1 user overrided value

Equation TT-1 Details:

The fraction of CH4 in landfill gas (F), is it based on a measured value or default value	Default
Fraction by volume of CH4 in landfill gas	()
An MCF value other than the default of 1 was used	N

Waste Stream For Method3 Details:

Capacity of the landfill used (or the total quantity of waste-in-place) at the end of the "YrData" from design drawings or engineering estimates	()
Do you know the year when the landfill opened?	No
The year the landfill first received waste from company records, or 1960 (whichever is more recent)

Methane Generation and Emissions for Landfills without LFG Collection Systems

Methane Oxidation Fraction

Methane Oxidation Fraction TT-6

0.10

Gas Collection Systems details

Methane Generation Equation TT6

62.24 (Metric Tons)

Waste Stream Summary:

Stream Identification and Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity for Wood

Stream Name

Wood

Stream Description

Railroad ties, wooden pallets and other wood

Type(s) Of Waste Present In The Waste Stream

wood and wood product

Range of years for which both disposal and production data were used in Equation TT-2 to calculate the average waste disposal factor for the landfill

1983 to 2007

First year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

1983

Last year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

2020

Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity

Reporting Year	Method #1	Method #2	Method #3	Method #4	Decayrate	Waste disposed quantity (UOM)	Waste stream DOC value (UOM)	Is defaulted value from table TT1	Is value measured using 60 day anaerobic biodegradation test	Is based on total volatile solids measurements
1983	N	Y	N	N	0.04	72 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1984	N	Y	N	N	0.04	71 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1985	N	Y	N	N	0.04	77 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1986	N	Y	N	N	0.04	79 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1987	N	Y	N	N	0.04	147 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1988	N	Y	N	N	0.04	149 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1989	N	Y	N	N	0.04	146 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1990	N	Y	N	N	0.04	157 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1991	N	Y	N	N	0.04	110 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1992	N	Y	N	N	0.04	129 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1993	N	Y	N	N	0.04	104 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1994	N	Y	N	N	0.04	113 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1995	N	Y	N	N	0.04	111 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1996	N	Y	N	N	0.04	183 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1997	N	Y	N	N	0.04	200 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1998	N	Y	N	N	0.04	202 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1999	N	Y	N	N	0.04	202 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2000	N	Y	N	N	0.04	198 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2001	N	Y	N	N	0.04	203 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2002	N	Y	N	N	0.04	143 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2003	N	Y	N	N	0.04	126 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2004	N	Y	N	N	0.04	148 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2005	N	Y	N	N	0.04	142 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2006	N	Y	N	N	0.04	155 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2007	N	Y	N	N	0.04	154 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2008	Y	N	N	N	0.04	271 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2009	Y	N	N	N	0.04	57 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2010	Y	N	N	N	0.04	104 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2011	Y	N	N	N	0.04	91 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2012	Y	N	N	N	0.04	157 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2013	Y	N	N	N	0.04	166 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2014	Y	N	N	N	0.04	123 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2015	Y	N	N	N	0.04	197 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2016	Y	N	N	N	0.04	294 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2017	Y	N	N	N	0.04	302 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2018	Y	N	N	N	0.04	328 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2019	Y	N	N	N	0.04	235 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2020	Y	N	N	N	0.04	156 (Metric Tons)	0.43 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N

Stream Identification and Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity for Inert Materials

Stream Name

Inert Materials

Stream Description

Rocks, soil and plastic

Type(s) Of Waste Present In The Waste Stream

inert waste

Range of years for which both disposal and production data were used in Equation TT-2 to calculate the average waste disposal factor for the landfill

1983 to 2007

First year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

1983

Last year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

2020

Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity

Reporting Year	Method #1	Method #2	Method #3	Method #4	Waste disposed quantity (UOM)	Waste stream DOC value (UOM)	Is defaulted value from table TT1	Is value measured using 60 day anaerobic biodegradation test	Is based on total volatile solids measurements
1983	N	Y	N	N	106 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1984	N	Y	N	N	105 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1985	N	Y	N	N	113 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1986	N	Y	N	N	116 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1987	N	Y	N	N	215 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1988	N	Y	N	N	219 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1989	N	Y	N	N	214 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1990	N	Y	N	N	231 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1991	N	Y	N	N	161 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1992	N	Y	N	N	189 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1993	N	Y	N	N	152 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1994	N	Y	N	N	166 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1995	N	Y	N	N	163 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1996	N	Y	N	N	268 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1997	N	Y	N	N	293 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1998	N	Y	N	N	296 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1999	N	Y	N	N	296 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2000	N	Y	N	N	291 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2001	N	Y	N	N	297 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2002	N	Y	N	N	210 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2003	N	Y	N	N	185 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2004	N	Y	N	N	217 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2005	N	Y	N	N	208 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2006	N	Y	N	N	228 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2007	N	Y	N	N	226 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2008	Y	N	N	N	61 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2009	Y	N	N	N	186 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2010	Y	N	N	N	218 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2011	Y	N	N	N	300 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2012	Y	N	N	N	365 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2013	Y	N	N	N	120 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2014	Y	N	N	N	98 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2015	Y	N	N	N	195 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2016	Y	N	N	N	338 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2017	Y	N	N	N	293 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2018	Y	N	N	N	186 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2019	Y	N	N	N	187 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2020	Y	N	N	N	415 (Metric Tons)	0 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N

Stream Identification and Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity for Construction and Demolition Material

Stream Name

Construction and Demolition Material

Stream Description

Insulation, building supplies

Type(s) Of Waste Present In The Waste Stream

construction and demolition

Range of years for which both disposal and production data were used in Equation TT-2 to calculate the average waste disposal factor for the landfill

1983 to 2007

First year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

1983

Last year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

2020

Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity

Reporting Year	Method #1	Method #2	Method #3	Method #4	Decayrate	Waste disposed quantity (UOM)	Waste stream DOC value (UOM)	Is defaulted value from table TT1	Is value measured using 60 day anaerobic biodegradation test	Is based on total volatile solids measurements
1983	N	Y	N	N	0.04	79 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1984	N	Y	N	N	0.04	79 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1985	N	Y	N	N	0.04	85 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1986	N	Y	N	N	0.04	87 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1987	N	Y	N	N	0.04	162 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1988	N	Y	N	N	0.04	164 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1989	N	Y	N	N	0.04	161 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1990	N	Y	N	N	0.04	173 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1991	N	Y	N	N	0.04	121 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1992	N	Y	N	N	0.04	142 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1993	N	Y	N	N	0.04	114 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1994	N	Y	N	N	0.04	125 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1995	N	Y	N	N	0.04	122 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1996	N	Y	N	N	0.04	201 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1997	N	Y	N	N	0.04	220 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1998	N	Y	N	N	0.04	222 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1999	N	Y	N	N	0.04	223 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2000	N	Y	N	N	0.04	218 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2001	N	Y	N	N	0.04	223 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2002	N	Y	N	N	0.04	158 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2003	N	Y	N	N	0.04	139 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2004	N	Y	N	N	0.04	163 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2005	N	Y	N	N	0.04	156 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2006	N	Y	N	N	0.04	171 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2007	Y	N	N	N	0.04	170 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2008	Y	N	N	N	0.04	61 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2009	Y	N	N	N	0.04	142 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2010	Y	N	N	N	0.04	205 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2011	Y	N	N	N	0.04	166 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2012	Y	N	N	N	0.04	128 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2013	Y	N	N	N	0.04	183 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2014	Y	N	N	N	0.04	212 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2015	Y	N	N	N	0.04	121 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2016	Y	N	N	N	0.04	437 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2017	Y	N	N	N	0.04	311 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2018	Y	N	N	N	0.04	268 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2019	Y	N	N	N	0.04	85 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2020	Y	N	N	N	0.04	72 (Metric Tons)	0.08 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N

Stream Identification and Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity for Paper Products

Stream Name

Paper Products

Stream Description

Filter material, general office trash

Type(s) Of Waste Present In The Waste Stream

pulp and paper wastes segregated into separate streams

other pulp and paper wastes

Range of years for which both disposal and production data were used in Equation TT-2 to calculate the average waste disposal factor for the landfill

1983 to 2007

First year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

1983

Last year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

2020

Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity

Reporting Year	Method #1	Method #2	Method #3	Method #4	Decayrate	Waste disposed quantity (UOM)	Waste stream DOC value (UOM)	Is defaulted value from table TT1	Is value measured using 60 day anaerobic biodegradation test	Is based on total volatile solids measurements
1983	N	Y	N	N	0.04	250 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1984	N	Y	N	N	0.04	247 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1985	N	Y	N	N	0.04	267 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1986	N	Y	N	N	0.04	274 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1987	N	Y	N	N	0.04	509 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1988	N	Y	N	N	0.04	517 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1989	N	Y	N	N	0.04	506 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1990	N	Y	N	N	0.04	545 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1991	N	Y	N	N	0.04	382 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1992	N	Y	N	N	0.04	447 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1993	N	Y	N	N	0.04	360 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1994	N	Y	N	N	0.04	393 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1995	N	Y	N	N	0.04	385 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1996	N	Y	N	N	0.04	633 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1997	N	Y	N	N	0.04	692 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1998	N	Y	N	N	0.04	699 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1999	N	Y	N	N	0.04	700 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2000	N	Y	N	N	0.04	687 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2001	N	Y	N	N	0.04	703 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2002	N	Y	N	N	0.04	496 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2003	N	Y	N	N	0.04	437 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2004	N	Y	N	N	0.04	513 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2005	N	Y	N	N	0.04	492 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2006	N	Y	N	N	0.04	539 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2007	Y	N	N	N	0.04	535 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2008	Y	N	N	N	0.04	389 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2009	Y	N	N	N	0.04	481 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2010	Y	N	N	N	0.04	478 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2011	Y	N	N	N	0.04	466 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2012	Y	N	N	N	0.04	510 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2013	Y	N	N	N	0.04	413 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2014	Y	N	N	N	0.04	451 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2015	Y	N	N	N	0.04	138 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2016	Y	N	N	N	0.04	564 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2017	Y	N	N	N	0.04	496 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2018	Y	N	N	N	0.04	604 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2019	Y	N	N	N	0.04	175 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2020	Y	N	N	N	0.04	441 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N

Stream Identification and Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity for Other Waste

Stream Name

Other Waste

Stream Description

Sludge material, hoses

Type(s) Of Waste Present In The Waste Stream

other industrial solid waste

Range of years for which both disposal and production data were used in Equation TT-2 to calculate the average waste disposal factor for the landfill

1983 to 2007

First year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

1983

Last year this waste stream was placed in the landfill

2020

Method(s) used to determine historical waste stream quantity

Reporting Year	Method #1	Method #2	Method #3	Method #4	Decayrate	Waste disposed quantity (UOM)	Waste stream DOC value (UOM)	Is defaulted value from table TT1	Is value measured using 60 day anaerobic biodegradation test	Is based on total volatile solids measurements
1983	N	Y	N	N	0.06	104 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1984	N	Y	N	N	0.06	103 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1985	N	Y	N	N	0.06	112 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1986	N	Y	N	N	0.06	115 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1987	N	Y	N	N	0.06	213 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1988	N	Y	N	N	0.06	216 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1989	N	Y	N	N	0.06	211 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1990	N	Y	N	N	0.06	228 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1991	N	Y	N	N	0.06	160 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1992	N	Y	N	N	0.06	187 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1993	N	Y	N	N	0.06	150 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1994	N	Y	N	N	0.06	164 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1995	N	Y	N	N	0.06	161 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1996	N	Y	N	N	0.06	265 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1997	N	Y	N	N	0.06	289 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1998	N	Y	N	N	0.06	292 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
1999	N	Y	N	N	0.06	293 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2000	N	Y	N	N	0.06	287 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2001	N	Y	N	N	0.06	294 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2002	N	Y	N	N	0.06	208 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2003	N	Y	N	N	0.06	183 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2004	N	Y	N	N	0.06	215 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2005	N	Y	N	N	0.06	206 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2006	N	Y	N	N	0.06	225 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2007	Y	N	N	N	0.06	224 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2008	Y	N	N	N	0.06	223 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2009	Y	N	N	N	0.06	440 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2010	Y	N	N	N	0.06	1 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2011	Y	N	N	N	0.06	92 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2012	Y	N	N	N	0.06	971 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2013	Y	N	N	N	0.06	185 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2014	Y	N	N	N	0.06	159 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2015	Y	N	N	N	0.06	780 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2016	Y	N	N	N	0.06	1052 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2017	Y	N	N	N	0.06	528 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2018	Y	N	N	N	0.06	22 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2019	Y	N	N	N	0.06	986 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N
2020	Y	N	N	N	0.06	384 (Metric Tons)	0.2 (Metric Tons)	Y	N	N

Method #1: Used one of the waste quantity measurement methods specified in 98.463(a)(2)(i): direct mass measurements, direct volume measurements multiplied by waste stream density, mass balance procedures (difference between the mass of process inputs and the mass of process outputs), or the number of loads multiplied by the mass of waste per load based on the working capacity of the vehicle or container.
Method #2: Calculated the average waste disposal rate per Equation TT-2 and calculated the waste disposal quantities for historic years in which direct waste disposal measurements are not available using historical production data per Equation TT-3.
Method #3: Calculated an average annual bulk waste disposal quantity for historic years when waste quantity data as determined by other methods are available consecutively for the most recent disposal years (Equation TT-4a).
Method #4: Calculated an average annual bulk waste disposal quantity for historic years when waste quantity data as determined by other methods are available for sporadic (non-consecutive) years (Equation TT-4b).